Posts Tagged ‘common sense’

It’s Hell to Believe There Ain’t a Hell of a Chance

I’m tired of reading press coverage on the GOP race – it’s all slanted, purposefully misleading, or perhaps in a best case scenario, totally ignorant. But I did think there was some interesting information in the Iowa Entrance Polls that the Average Joe may not have checked out. I got them from CNN here: http://www.cnn.com/election/2012/primaries/epolls/ia

Now, I’m no political expert or talking head (and have zero desire to be), but I had some thoughts when I looked at those numbers, so I’m tossing out a few opinions here.

First, a few preliminary things:

  • Perry and Bachmann continued the “poor showing” theme leading Bachmann to call it quits and Perry to either “reassess” or power on to SC, depending on what moment you catch him. But has he ever known what he was doing in the first place? Oops!
  • Gingrich isn’t going anywhere, of course, because even though he’s in a freefall, he’ll keep hanging around like a bad stench, which is his raison d’être.
  • For some reason the media is still talking about Jon Huntsman with his 1%. Who’s that, you say? Well, he’s busy campaigning in New Hampshire, hoping to pull a Santorum there. Maybe he will! Ooooh-hooo! And then the Republicans could have another candidate to talk about who will promptly fall by the wayside two weeks later.

Now, the new “top tier” is Romney, Santorum, and Paul:

  • Rick Santorum? Are you kidding me? Surely no one is taking him seriously. He’s just the current Johnny-come-lately to make Republicans hope they’re not going to be stuck with Romney. Please note these stats: More than 90% of Santorum-supporters in Iowa chose him within the “last few days” or “in December.” In other words, he spent a lot of time and money doing a last minute push in Iowa to get his name out there, and the wishy-washy voters who hadn’t chosen a candidate took the bait. Support that drops out of nowhere goes nowhere.
  • Mitt Romney. He’s the candidate Republicans hate and the one they’re probably gonna get. 48% of the people who voted for him did so chiefly because of a belief that he can defeat Obama. (I highly doubt it.) Romney also got the highest percentage (29%) of voters who chose him with reservations (because, like I said, Republicans don’t even like the guy). Oh, and here’s something for all of you 99%-types. Guess who got the highest percentage of votes from the folks who make $100K+? Yes, that’s right. Romney. They’re right to vote for him, of course, because he’ll take the money they slip to his campaign and turn it around in tax breaks and bailouts and other questionable financial dealings if he’s elected. Also worth noting is that, while Romney is the obvious front-runner (Santorum supporters celebrating their 8-vote margin are delusional), he’s still not getting the support he wants and needs out of Republicans at large. It’s sad when a guy with no chance (Santorum) can run a two-week campaign that catches up with a guy who should be blowing him out of the water.
  • Ron Paul. Somehow he’s still persona non grata to the media, but the Iowa votes indicate he’s definitely still in the game and gaining ground. (I can only imagine how much his message would catch fire across the country if only the media would let people hear about it.) Paul more than doubled the number of Iowa votes he secured in 2008, while Romney’s number was almost the same. So, Romney is still as popular (and as unpopular) as he was 4 years ago, but Paul’s support has doubled. Paul’s percentages last night also indicate that he’s the frontrunner among voters ages 18-39 (with a HUGE advantage among voters under 29), and the candidate preferred by voters with less than $50K in income (even more among voters with less than $30K). Another obvious Paul stronghold? Voters who made up their minds before December. Ron Paul voters aren’t impressed with ad campaigns (that’s another stat on the chart), they’re not beholden to the media (otherwise they wouldn’t know who he is), and they’re the most prominent group to “strongly favor” their chosen candidate. Ron Paul supporters aren’t interested in which way the wind blows; they are looking for a candidate with substance and integrity who knows his mind and doesn’t change it depending on what group he’s talking to at the time. Here’s hoping there’s something to that old adage of “slow and steady wins the race.”

What else the stats say about Ron Paul:

  • He outscored the rest of the field among voters who deemed the most important quality in a candidate to be that he was a “true conservative.” He also blew the other candidates out of the water in shoring up the voters with a moderate or liberal ideology. So… what now? Voters who want a true conservative in office have picked Ron Paul as their man. And voters who identify themselves as moderate or liberal ALSO picked Ron Paul? It would certainly seem that he’s able to appeal to a broad spectrum of voters – voters who probably recognize that he’s conservative on matters that call for it (like when it comes to spending taxpayer dollars), and he’s (gasp!) liberal when it comes to keeping the government’s big fat nose out of matters that should be none of its business. I’m guessing that also means that Democrats who voted for “hope” and “change” and got a same ol’, same ol’ Republicrat in the last election would consider casting their votes for Ron Paul as well.
  • Rick Santorum got a whopping 58% of his votes from folks who pinpointed Abortion as their “most important issue.” I keep hoping the pro-life crowd will figure out that abortion is just a talking point that Republicans use to get elected, and then they never actually follow through to do anything about it. Ron Paul doesn’t say much about abortion, because he has been busy predicting the housing collapse, trying to illuminate the problem with the budget deficit, decrying expensive wars over nothing (and refusing to incite yet another one with Iran), and putting up a fight against politicians who are railroading the Constitution at every turn. However, I doubt it’s even possible to find a candidate (certainly in this race, and probably in politics as a whole) who has been more consistently pro-life AND consistently doing something about it as Ron Paul. And if his name was actually out there, and the voters knew what he was all about, the “issues” voters who choose based on abortion stance, health care, etc. would LOVE Dr. Paul.

This race has been so crazy, it’s hard to guess what will happen next. Maybe after New Hampshire everyone will be talking about Jon Huntsman like he’s the second coming and it’ll be “Santorum-who?” again. But whatever shenanigans are going on, I’m expecting Romney to maintain his same level of begrudging support, and I bet we’ll see Ron Paul continue his climb to the chagrin of the media and the clueless GOP brass. And I’ll be stuck between being cynical and desperately clinging to hope.

I Ain’t Standing Up for Nothing

“Every day when I wake up, I see folks trading in their crowns for all these ‘paper or plastic?’ lives – an opiate for the masses’ hounds.”

If common sense keeps getting scarcer and scarcer, we are going to have to find a new name for it. It continues to boggle my mind how often simple reason seems to elude the average person. This is true for the self-entitled teenagers I encounter on a daily basis, on through the business world and up to the height of stupidity, otherwise known as the U.S. government. That is too broad a range to cover, though, so I am going to focus on the one we can all relate to: customer service.

Now, I understand that it takes all kinds to make a world, and not everyone is going to be a genius. Some people can sleep through class and get an A, while others struggle furiously just to come out with a C. But it’s called “common sense” because it’s supposed to be even across the board. You don’t have to be book-smart and you certainly don’t need a doctorate to be successful. My grandfather quit school after 5th grade to go work on the farm, and he’s one of the smartest men I’ve ever known. He had common sense. My brother can do complicated math problems in his head in seconds, where most people would require a couple sheets of notebook paper and probably a calculator. His “smart-ness” can be tested and measured, but his common sense remains at the forefront, so he’s a great problem-solver with a head for business.

Unfortunately, I think the world has come to value resumes over people, and policies over principles. The result is a lot of painfully dumb people in prestigious positions because their degrees said they should be capable of doing the job, whether they could put it into practice or not.

My friend Brandon has been putting in job applications lately. He has a heavy background in construction, but was recently asked how he could expect to do construction work if he didn’t speak “Mexican.” I am serious. That happened. So, not finding work in his field, he hit the streets to apply in other areas, like food service and retail. On his retail application, he was asked questions like, “Do you enjoy talking to angry customers?” and had to choose a number from 1 (I hate it) to 5 (I love it). After honestly answering the barrage of questions and submitting his application, he learned that anyone who answered 2, 3, or 4 for any of those questions had their applications immediately thrown out. I took a second to let that soak in (and to make sure I heard him correctly), and then said, “So, they want to hire… liars?” Common sense would have said to throw out all the ones and the fives for being, at worst, liars, or at best, completely inept at any job that would require interacting with other people. But, instead of using common sense, this company had a handy policy manual.

Never underestimate the power of a stupid policy in the hands of a stupid person.

My favorite example is still the Hickory Farms manager who would not let me fill up my own cup as part of my combo meal because if I didn’t use one of their cups, it would cut into their profits. If you missed that one the first time, it is worth a read: HERE.

Or, there’s the time my Daddy went to Subway and ordered a 6-inch sub on whole wheat bread – easy, right? But he received a foot-long sub, and when he pointed out the error, was told, “But you said WHOLE wheat.”

This has all been on my mind since I attempted to run a simple errand yesterday at lunch. I try to avoid stores as often as I can (probably for this very reason), but I make an exception for craft stores, which are my kryptonite. Still, I try not to indulge too often, because when I get near scrapbooking supplies, I start throwing money around like a lobbyist on Capitol Hill. I had to go yesterday, though, because I received two identical Cricut cartridges as a gift and I wanted to exchange the duplicate for one I didn’t already have. I didn’t want to return it for money or for a store credit or anything like that. Just a simple exchange – I’ll give you this one, you give me that one. I went first to Michael’s, where I’ve spent thousands of dollars in the past, and they turned me away for my lack of receipt. (Maybe I stumbled over the word “gift” or “even exchange.”) I didn’t fight the fight, because there’s another crafting giant just across the street.

So, onward to A.C. Moore. When I arrived, there was only one person at the register (another arrived a few minutes later), so I stood back and waited until all the paying customers had been helped (including the ones who arrived in line well after me) and then I explained my situation. Namely, that I had received a duplicate cartridge as a gift, it was unopened, they carried the same one (I could see it from where I stood), and I simply wanted to exchange the cartridge in my hand for another of equal value. It couldn’t really get much simpler than that.

The lady asked if I had the receipt. “No, it was a gift. But I don’t want to do a return. I just want to exchange it for another cartridge of equal value.” She explained that she needed to call her manager. I often think this is just a tactic to create an imaginary person who will back up the original story. I heard her tell the “manager” that there was a lady who wanted to RETURN a Cricut cartridge without the receipt. (Which is not what I said – TWICE! – but whatever.) She hung up the phone and said that she could give me a store credit for $29.99, but that was all. Bear in mind, right next to us was a wall display with the very same cartridge priced at $89.99. Again, I reiterated that I did not want to return the cartridge – I wanted to exchange it for one of equal value.

Now, let me pause my tale for a moment and paint you a picture. There I stand, in a retail store whose niche is crafting. I am holding a $90 cartridge, which fits a $300 cutting machine. So, I’m not just dropping by because I needed a little project to stave off boredom on a rainy day. I am obviously a serious crafter with several hundred dollars – if not thousands – invested in this hobby that is their very reason for existing. So, in common sense terms, I am exactly the kind of customer they want to keep around and keep happy.

Now, back to the salesperson, who is trying to explain to me why the cartridge in my hand was not worth the same amount as the identical cartridges hanging on the nearby wall…

“You see,” she says, “you can go online and buy those cartridges – or anything in this store, really – for MUCH cheaper than you can buy it here.”

The implication in her mind was that I could have bought my cartridge for $5 online, and I was trying to trade it in for a $90 cartridge in the store. Which, even if I had, when I gave them the cartridge to re-sell, its value would become the $90 that they were selling it for, regardless of whether I paid $5 or $5000 for it.

The implication in MY mind, which I voiced to her, was, “So, basically, you’re saying that I should do all my craft shopping online?” She was too far gone on the crazy train to object, and could only shrug and nod half-heartedly, while the other salesperson looked like a deer caught in the headlights. She saw where the conversation had gone terribly wrong, but did not interject.

I turned and left the store, shaking my head in sheer disbelief. I wonder if we had recorded that whole conversation and played it back to her an hour later, would she have realized her lapse in judgment? And is she really the one to blame for being dense, or is it because “company policy” has been hammered into her brain until she no longer felt able to think for herself?

I immediately sent a tweet to share my crazy story, and this morning I was greeted by an @ reply from A.C. Moore’s official Twitter. I am happy to say that they solved the problem with common sense and level-headedness, and when I returned to my local store over lunch today, I was in and out with no problem at all. Plus, the two friends accompanying me (so we could have lunch afterwards) shopped while I was exchanging my cartridge and both turned up at the checkout with a handful of items. Thanks to a tiny bit of customer service and common sense, A.C. Moore kept one customer and gained two more.

That would make a happy ending for this blog, but I’m afraid I have yet another tale of woe to report from lunch! We proceeded to one of our favorite spots, Ledo’s Pizza, to grab a quick bite and get back to work. Their pizza is delicious and they have the best house salad dressing I’ve ever tasted. All three of us are frequent customers.

We took our seats and waited a while for the waitress to come over. No big deal. When she did come over, her rundown of the “specials” left us all scratching our heads, and when we asked for clarification about the salad special, she was so flustered that her response made no sense at all. Again, no big deal. We went on with our order, Kelli getting a salad, and Jessica and I sharing a pizza and splitting a side salad. I ordered for both of us, saying, “We are going to share a medium pizza. We’d like pepperoni on the WHOLE pizza and mushrooms on HALF.” While I was talking, I even made the hand motions to show the whole pizza vs. the half pizza and made eye contact, which is my usual practice. I made sure to be very clear and specific, because the first time we ordered by saying a “pepperoni pizza with mushrooms on half,” we’d gotten a pizza that was half pepperoni and half mushroom. That time, I didn’t even mention anything about it, because I felt like I hadn’t been clear enough, and I usually go with the flow at restaurants as much as possible.

The food arrived, and Kelli’s salad still had onions on it, when she had ordered it without, and Jessica and I received a pizza with pepperoni and mushrooms covering the whole thing. So, basically, half of the pizza was still right, but the other half was wrong. The waitress took the pizza away and said another one would be out soon, and I hate to think even now about how that pizza was chucked in the trash can while we sat waiting for our food. Kelli was finished eating by the time our second pizza arrived – this time, with pepperoni on half, and mushrooms on half – again, half right, half wrong. The waitress reached to take that pizza away as well and I stopped her. Not wanting to wait for another pizza to cook, I suggested that she just bring me some pepperoni which I could add to my half. I sloooooowly nibbled through two pieces of mushrooms-only pizza, waiting for the arrival of the accompanying pepperoni. When she brought it, the pepperoni was burnt, which explained why it took so long. So, I sat eating mushroom pizza with burnt pepperoni and practically begging for drink refills. Also of note, I had to tell her what I was drinking every time she came to the table. Never mind that she had put a lemon wedge on top of my cup to differentiate my Diet Pepsi from Jessica’s regular drink. (Kelli had water.)

Making sure not to check back with us, our waitress dropped three checks on the table and quickly disappeared. I picked it up, hoping (rather than believing) that she had given us any sort of special consideration. She hadn’t. I probably would have just let it go, but after the ordeal the day before, and the unbelievably shabby way we had been treated, I had to speak up. Even so, I was careful to be polite, hoping that a little diplomacy would go a long way to making sure that we left happy and she didn’t go cry in the back of the store for the rest of her shift. She seemed shocked that we didn’t want to pay full price, and her offer of amends was to not charge us for one of the toppings on one-half of the pizza. So, basically, two wrong pizzas, inedible pepperoni, time wasted, and her solution was to deduct 75 cents from the check – or, actually, to deduct 75 cents between our two checks. I remained calm, and reminded her that our pizza had come out wrong twice, and then added that my pepperoni had come out burnt even then. This prompted her to make the oh-so-generous gesture to not charge for EITHER of the toppings on the pizza. (Wow. A whole dollar.) She was genuinely too clueless to realize how insulting that was to us, or how unacceptable that would be, so we had no recourse but to accept her measly offer, pay the checks, and leave. I did not even have it in me to slight her on the tip – possibly because I felt so sorry for her since she didn’t have a brain. I’ve yet to check back with Ledo’s to see if perhaps a manager could do something to right the situation, but it was the second time in as many days that I felt slighted and unappreciated in two establishments to which I’ve been very loyal.

Maybe it’s just me, but in a time when all I hear about is the economic downturn, I’d think that businesses would be doing everything possible to retain their loyal customers. Maybe they’ve all forgotten how that’s done? Or maybe they just don’t care?

Certainly, common sense is no longer coming standard issue.